Archive

Posts Tagged ‘working group’

SCIS+IRIS evaluation

August 24th, 2010 Peter Axel 11 comments

Please write your feedback as a comment below. Any feedback will be much appreciated and reported to next years organisers.

Thank you for attending the conference and for your involvement and commitment,

Gitte Tjørnehøj, Hanne Westh Nicolajsen, John Persson, Karl Kautz, Lise Heeager, Peter Axel Nielsen
SCIS+IRIS organisers

Social events

August 20th, 2010 John Comments off

The social events at IRIS is inspired by the local history of the Rold area. From ancient time Rold forest  has been a hiding place for outcasts from all of northern Jutland. The history of these people will frame the social events at IRIS and the working groups are named after well known robbers from this period. Below you can read about these people as “the robbers from Rold” and find the description of the robbers giving the “names of the working groups”.

The Robbers from Rold

– or actually the robbers in Rold since most came from other places

Rold forest is the biggest forest in Jutland and from the early middle-age up to around 1850 it has given shelter to both real living robbers but also indeed the stories about them.  After the robbers disappeared, the stories has grown first told from one to another and later the Robbers from Rold has been a loved theme of talks, books and songs.

In the late Viking age you could still sail all the way to here on what was then a river. In the swamps around the river the tribes had their castles and “robbed” tradesmen passing by (made them pay toll).

Later in the middle age these castles had developed further and moved up in the hills but they still took whatever they could get from travellers. It did not help much that queen Margrethe the first either paid or forced the robber chieftains to give up their castles, since all kinds of unwanted and lawless persons from most of northern Jutland came to the forest to hide and make a living from what they could: robbery.  Around 1800 -1850 this culminated with a robber society that terrorized the Rold forest area and even most of the northern Jutland.

At that time travelling through Rold forest you should count on being robbed if traveling alone or after dark. Travelers thus gathered at Inn’s north or south of the forest to form bigger groups and pass through the forest in daylight. The headlines were violence, attacks on vehicle, receiving of robbed goods, and housebreaking and muggings.

The people being attacked mostly did survive but with lasting wounds on both body and soul. The robbers used threats of further violence or burning down property to keep their victims silent. This worked because people often with good reason did not trust the police either.  This fearful and unfortunate situation was part of many people’s lives in these years.

Bette Fanden (the small devil), Nøragersmeden (the smith from Nørager), Petronillen (her name was Pernille), Lorentz Meier and Peder Hjorth were the names of some of the most well known and feared robbers in and around Rold. They were actually real existing robbers documented through both books and legal notes from trials.

After an extremely violent attack taking place on the rim of the forest in 1836 that lead to the death of the victim, the leading robbers were jailed in 1837. In 1844 it was all over since they were all convicted after seven long years of trials. The case has been the biggest criminal case in Denmark until now. More than 200 persons were convicted; 27 for robbery, 50 for “receiving stolen goods”, and 150 for other crimes.

Seven of the worst were whipped in public and sentenced to slavery in jail in Copenhagen for the rest of their lives. The rest were “just” sentenced to slavery in jail for fewer years or even just for months on “water and bread” (in their local jails).

After this episode people could live relatively safely in Rold, even though there were still robber attacks until early 1900.


Names of the working groups

The working groups are named after the robbers:

Collaboration: Bette Fanden (Johannes Jensen from Stenild) was the brain behind much of the crime and the most well know. He was the height of a 12 year old boy, but of the strength of a full grown. He earned his name while robbing an old woman covered in a whole cows skin (including the head) to hide his physically easily recognizable appearance. She thought that her visitor was the devil himself (Fanden) because of the horns, but a rather small one (“bette” means small on the dialect of the area).

Organisational systems: Oldmowr means great grandmother in the dialect. In Danish we have a saying: “this is due to the devil and his great grandmother”, when some bad things happen. Since Bette Fanden had that name, his female companion was called Oldmowr, even though it was unfair. Her name was Mette and they were formally married. She was known as a rather kind and nice person. Surprisingly she was not part of the trials, even though she clearly must have knows of her husband’s work.

Strategic development and use: Lorentz Meier wanted to travel to Germany to do his trade after he had been educated as shoemaker in Aalborg (a few km north of Rold forest), but he never got pass Randers (30 km south of Rold forest) where he ended up in the pubs drinking all his money away. Living like that is expensive so he started his other carrier by robbing his former boss in Aalborg. He was so though, he did not say a sound while being given the 27 whiplashes.

Public sector / methodology: Petronillen (Ane Pernille Andersdatter Storm) was a “free living” woman and the lover of Lorentz Meier. She may have been the cruellest of the robbers, known for having placed a baby on the stove in order to make the mother revel the hiding places of the wealth of the family. She was – which was very unusually for a woman – also sentenced to public whipping.

Learning/ Education: Nøragersmeden was a blacksmith from Nørager. He was born in a family with a reputation for violence, mugging and pick-pocketing (A tinker family, too). In contraire of Bette Fanden the smith was big and strong, so when they were out together it must have been a wired sight. Still he was the one that took revenge when Bette Fanden once had kept the booty to him after a housebreak. He tricked Bette Fanden to come out on the heathers looking for a hidden treasure. On the way Bette Fanden had to pee. While doing that he was attacked by his mate, beaten up to tell where the money was and left with his pants down and his hands tied on the back to jump all way home, while the smith collected the money in their hiding place in Bette Fandens pillow at home.

Information systems development: Peder Hjorth was part of the inner circles of the gang, but we do not know much about him. From the documents from the trials we can read that he was actually the best pick-pocket of all. He did his work at the local markets – and once talked Bette Fanden from robbing Nøragersmeden, since “it is wrong to rob one with whom you have done so many robberies…”

ERP, Mergers and offshoring: Snøvle Maren was another woman that did go with robbers on their raids. Her name was Maren Carlsdatter. She had no nose and it had probably been eaten away by syphilis at an advanced stage. When she participated the robbers were usually masked.

Open/service innovation: Laang Ajs (in dialect: Long Anders) was in jail more than once, but he also escaped quickly. People said about him that he could open doors by looking at them. The reality was that he hid a small watch spring shaped like a saw between his teeth and his lower jaw ready to use when needed. After the police found out he too had to stay where he was put.

Social media: Tarmløs (without guts) had been a “patch tailor” repairing cloths, but he had suffered hunger and grown so slim they called him Tarmløs. He liked to set fire on houses – The stories say that “he was so cool, when they made houses hot as the robbers said when they burned down homes”.

Working Groups IRIS

August 6th, 2010 Peter Axel Comments off

Working group members
All IRIS participants are assigned to one of the following working groups. Paper authors are assigned to a specific working group based primarily on the theme of their paper. Participants without papers are likewise asked to participate in a working group.
All these working group participants (with and without papers) are expected to stay with the assigned working group through out the working group sessions and contribute to the discussions of the working group papers (and the IRIS games).

The working group sessions
The first and short working group meeting is dedicated socialising and organising.
All participants present themselves briefly and discuss the practical set up of the rest of the meetings. The purpose is to ensure sufficient time for the discussion of each paper.  Approximately 1 hour per paper.

Following working group meetings – discussing papers
The author is asked to present briefly, his/her aspirations with the paper, what types of input is wished for, etc.  Authors are not supposed to present the content of the papers as all working group participants are expected to have read the papers in advance. Hence, PowerPoint presentations will not be catered for.

The first discussant(s) give his/her constructive comments to the paper regarding research questions, analysis, discussion, conclusions, structure, argumentation, flow, theory, methodology, references, etc. Provide positive and negative feedback and if possible follow this with a discussion of how to meet these challenges. After the first discussant has finished the rest of the participants are expected, on turn to further comment and discuss the paper.

The first discussant is the one in the group list following the paper being discussed. Meaning the first in the list is first opponent of the last paper. For an example see below.

Author(s)/paper First discussant(s)
1 Per Svejvig. Two Contrasting Perspectives of Enterprise Systems: Towards Reconciliation Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen
2 Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen. Offshoring – the new dilemma of IS research Maria Alaranta and EEro Martela
3 Maria Alaranta and Eero Martela. Overcoming the Knowledge Gaps in Post-Merger Integration – A Case Study on Merging Corrective Software Maintenance Processes Siw Lundqvist
4 Siw Lundqvist. In a Merger: A Lack of Information about IS and the Job Situation Christian Koch, Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen
5 Christian Koch, Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen. How little do we need to know about Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)? – A critical review of information systems research on ERP Ondrej Zach
6 Ondrej Zach. ERP System Success Assessment in SMEs Per Svejvig

The working group leader is responsible for the active participation of all working group participants as well as sound and constructive discussions.

Working Groups

Collaboration (Bette Fanden)
Working group leader: Keld Bødker
22 Jan Pries-Heje and Trine Hald Commisso. Improving Team Performance.iris2010_submission_22
23 Fredric Landqvist. Case Study: Emerging Networked Event Collaboration. iris2010_submission_23
27 Per Flensburg, Gunnar Mosnik and Bo-Göran Bernheim. On process modelling between contact centres and administrations in Swedish municipalities. iris2010_submission_27
56 Kurt Dauer Keller. Explicating the application of work organizational information systems. iris2010_submission_56
58 Ann Svensson. Experiences from Aircraft Maintenance Professions: Challenges for Knowledge Integration. iris2010_submission_58
Without paper: John Persson, Lars Bækgaard
Organisational systems (Oldmowr)
Working group leader: Karin Axelsson
4 Odd Steen and Nicklas Holmberg. Business Rules Friendly or not so Business Rules Friendly Business Concepts Modelling – Early Experiences from a Business Rules Project on a Digital Vaccination Recommendation Service. iris2010_submission_4
10 Andreas Ring. Geographic Information as Basis for Decision-making in Crisis management. iris2010_submission_10
26 Wipawee Uppatumwichian. The complementary role of end user development to enterprise systems in budgeting: Research proposal. iris2010_submission_26
33 Taline Jadaan and Dick Stenmark. A multiple case study of middleware architecture approach in RFID applications. iris2010_submission_33
38 Erik Borglund. Use of Records as Means to Provide a Common Operational Picture. iris2010_submission_38
60 Rasmus Dalby and Kenneth Nielsen. Knowledge Management Driven by Business Cases in Danish Municipalities. iris2010_submission_60
Without paper: Tomas Lindroth, Jeremy Rose

Strategic development and use (Lorentz Meier)
Working group leader: Maria Åkesson
8 Najmul Islam. An integrated model to understand Information System continuance in an organization. iris2010_submission_8
14 Nicholas Blessing Mavengere. Response Ability: A Strategic Agility Requirement for Supply Chains. iris2010_submission_14
35 John Jeansson. Issues of benefits fluctuation during EHR benefits management projects. iris2010_submission_35
43 Annemette Hansen. The multi-dimensional nature of IT alignment. iris2010_submission_43
50 Fredik Bengtsson. Sustainable software development framework. iris2010_submission_50
53 Michael Dahl, Torbjörn Lundmark, Jenny Eriksson Lundström and Therese Monstad. Aligning IT to Business Goals: Holistic IT-Governance and Strategy Implementation. iris2010_submission_53
Without paper: Ojelanki Ngwenyama, Taina Kaapu
Public sector / methodology (Petronillen)
Working group leader: Carl Erik Moe
16 Ida Lindgren. Electronic Services in Public Sector Organisations – A Conceptual Analysis and Discussion of Public E-service and E-administration Characteristics. iris2010_submission_16
17 Marius Johannessen. Different Theory, Different Result: Examining how Different theories lead to Different Insights in Government 2.0 Research. iris2010_submission_17
34 Miria Grisot and Margunn Aanestad. Engagement in practice, engagement with practice: exploring multiplicity in complex infrastructural arrangements. iris2010_submission_34
45 Keld Pedersen and Lars Kristian Hansen. IT Project Portfolio Management – Challenges faced by Danish municipalities. iris2010_submission_45
48 Sturla Bakke. How principles of human-computer interactions could contribute in black-boxing complexities in information infrastructures. iris2010_submission_48
52 Carl Erik Moe. Procurement   of IS in the public sector – A literature review. iris2010_submission_52
Without paper: Sari Aalmela, Katarina Lindblad-Gidlund, Suprateek Sarker
Learning/Education (Nøragersmeden)
Working group leader: Lars Svensson
11 Jo Smedley. Modelling the impact of learning through technology. iris2010_submission_11
28 Hanna Olsson. Multimedia Learning – Identifying research directions. iris2010_submission_28
31 Viveca Asproth, Stig C. Holmberg, Christina Amcoff Nyström, Hanna Olsson and Lena-maria Öberg. Triple Loop Learning – a course development model. iris2010_submission_31
36 Rasmus Rasmussen, Benedicte Fleron, Morten Hertzum and Jesper Simonsen. Implementation of Electronic Whiteboards at Two Emergency Departments. iris2010_submission_36
51 Lars Svensson, Stefan Nilsson, Pia Svanberg and Lars-Olof Johansson. From Tutor to Producer: Changes in the design space of online education. iris2010_submission_51
61 Pertti Järvinen. On a structure of a research paper. iris2010_submission_61
Without paper: Christina Keller
Information systems development (Peder Hjorth)
Working group leader: Jacob Nørbjerg
1 Karsten Jahn and Peter Axel Nielsen. Codified vs. Personalized – A Vertical Approach to the Dilemma of the Knowledge Management Strategies. iris2010_submission_1
9 Mikito Takada. Overpromise and underdeliver: goal-setting as a contributing factor to IS failure. iris2010_submission_9
25 Lise Tordrup Heeager. Compatibility of the agile and the disciplined approaches: a review article. iris2010_submission_25
30 Tero Paivärinta, Kari Smolander and Even Åby Larsen. Towards a Framework for Building Theory from ISD Practices. iris2010_submission_30
37 Jeffry Babb and Jacob Nørbjerg. A Model for Reflective Learning in Small Shop Agile Development. iris2010_submission_37
42 Anna Wingkvist, Morgan Ericsson, Welf Löwe and Rüdiger Lincke. Extending the Concept of Quality in Systems Development — Integrating Software and Information Quality. iris2010_submission_42
Without paper: Bendik Bygstad, Sabine Madsen
ERP, Mergers and offshoring (Snøvle Maren)
Working group leader: Jan Damsgaard
3 Per Svejvig. Two Contrasting Perspectives of Enterprise Systems: Towards Reconciliation. iris2010_submission_3
19 Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen. Offshoring – the new dilemma of IS research. iris2010_submission_19
7 Maria Alaranta and Eero Martela. Overcoming the Knowledge Gaps in Post-Merger Integration – A Case Study on Merging Corrective Software Maintenance Processes. iris2010_submission_7
18 Siw Lundqvist. In a Merger: A Lack of Information about IS and the Job Situation. iris2010_submission_18
24 Christian Koch, Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen. How little do we need to know about Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)? – A critical review of information systems research on ERP. iris2010_submission_24
49 Ondrej Zach. ERP System Success Assessment in SMEs. iris2010_submission_49
Without paper: Jan Ljungberg, Reima Suomi
Open/service innovation (Laang Ajs)
Working group leader: Ulrika Snis
5 Marita Holst, Anna Ståhlbröst and Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn. Openness in Living Labs – Facilitating Innovation. iris2010_submission_5
6 Pernilla Gripenberg. Individual ICT-Landscapes: A lense on Human-ICT relationships in transforming everyday lives. iris2010_submission_6
12 Carina Hallqvist. True Participation – a challenge for design of sustainable e-services. iris2010_submission_12
20 Markus Holzweber, Ada Scupola and Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen. Innovation Sources and Role of ICT in Facilities Management Services. iris2010_submission_20
32 Hendrik Hielkema. Living Labs, are there Results? iris2010_submission_32
55 Hanne Westh Nicolajsen, Ada Scupola and Flemming Sørensen. Open innovation using web2.0 technology. iris2010_submission_55
Without paper: Carina Ihlström-Eriksson, Eli Larsen
Social media (Tarmløs)
Working group leader: Judith Molka-Danielsen
15 Jan Henrik Storgårds and Johanna Bragge. Subjective Norm and Recommendation of Digital Games. iris2010_submission_15
29 Meri Kuikka, Virpi Tuunainen and Emmi Suhonen. Motivations for and barriers to the use of social exchange in online communities: Case Kassi. iris2010_submission_29
39 Karen Stendal, Judith Molka-Danielsen and Susan Balandin. Virtual worlds: A new opportunity for people with lifelong disabilities. iris2010_submission_39
41 Miia Äkkinen and Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen. Consumer values in social network services. iris2010_submission_41
47 Lina Nilsson, Malin Hofflander, Christel Borg and Sara Eriksén. From Twitter to data based patient record. iris2010_submission_47
54 Arto Lanamäki and Tero Päivärinta. Genre Analysis of Metacommunication in Wikipedia. iris2010_submission_54
Without paper: Espen Skorve, Maria Spante
Categories: Working groups Tags: , ,