Working Groups IRIS
Working group members
All IRIS participants are assigned to one of the following working groups. Paper authors are assigned to a specific working group based primarily on the theme of their paper. Participants without papers are likewise asked to participate in a working group.
All these working group participants (with and without papers) are expected to stay with the assigned working group through out the working group sessions and contribute to the discussions of the working group papers (and the IRIS games).
The working group sessions
The first and short working group meeting is dedicated socialising and organising.
All participants present themselves briefly and discuss the practical set up of the rest of the meetings. The purpose is to ensure sufficient time for the discussion of each paper. Approximately 1 hour per paper.
Following working group meetings – discussing papers
The author is asked to present briefly, his/her aspirations with the paper, what types of input is wished for, etc. Authors are not supposed to present the content of the papers as all working group participants are expected to have read the papers in advance. Hence, PowerPoint presentations will not be catered for.
The first discussant(s) give his/her constructive comments to the paper regarding research questions, analysis, discussion, conclusions, structure, argumentation, flow, theory, methodology, references, etc. Provide positive and negative feedback and if possible follow this with a discussion of how to meet these challenges. After the first discussant has finished the rest of the participants are expected, on turn to further comment and discuss the paper.
The first discussant is the one in the group list following the paper being discussed. Meaning the first in the list is first opponent of the last paper. For an example see below.
The working group leader is responsible for the active participation of all working group participants as well as sound and constructive discussions.
Working Groups
|
Collaboration (Bette Fanden)
|
|
Working group leader: Keld Bødker |
| 22 |
Jan Pries-Heje and Trine Hald Commisso. Improving Team Performance.iris2010_submission_22 |
| 23 |
Fredric Landqvist. Case Study: Emerging Networked Event Collaboration. iris2010_submission_23 |
| 27 |
Per Flensburg, Gunnar Mosnik and Bo-Göran Bernheim. On process modelling between contact centres and administrations in Swedish municipalities. iris2010_submission_27 |
| 56 |
Kurt Dauer Keller. Explicating the application of work organizational information systems. iris2010_submission_56 |
| 58 |
Ann Svensson. Experiences from Aircraft Maintenance Professions: Challenges for Knowledge Integration. iris2010_submission_58 |
|
Without paper: John Persson, Lars Bækgaard |
|
Organisational systems (Oldmowr)
|
|
Working group leader: Karin Axelsson |
| 4 |
Odd Steen and Nicklas Holmberg. Business Rules Friendly or not so Business Rules Friendly Business Concepts Modelling – Early Experiences from a Business Rules Project on a Digital Vaccination Recommendation Service. iris2010_submission_4 |
| 10 |
Andreas Ring. Geographic Information as Basis for Decision-making in Crisis management. iris2010_submission_10 |
| 26 |
Wipawee Uppatumwichian. The complementary role of end user development to enterprise systems in budgeting: Research proposal. iris2010_submission_26 |
| 33 |
Taline Jadaan and Dick Stenmark. A multiple case study of middleware architecture approach in RFID applications. iris2010_submission_33 |
| 38 |
Erik Borglund. Use of Records as Means to Provide a Common Operational Picture. iris2010_submission_38 |
| 60 |
Rasmus Dalby and Kenneth Nielsen. Knowledge Management Driven by Business Cases in Danish Municipalities. iris2010_submission_60 |
|
Without paper: Tomas Lindroth, Jeremy Rose |
|
Strategic development and use (Lorentz Meier)
|
|
Working group leader: Maria Åkesson |
| 8 |
Najmul Islam. An integrated model to understand Information System continuance in an organization. iris2010_submission_8 |
| 14 |
Nicholas Blessing Mavengere. Response Ability: A Strategic Agility Requirement for Supply Chains. iris2010_submission_14 |
| 35 |
John Jeansson. Issues of benefits fluctuation during EHR benefits management projects. iris2010_submission_35 |
| 43 |
Annemette Hansen. The multi-dimensional nature of IT alignment. iris2010_submission_43 |
| 50 |
Fredik Bengtsson. Sustainable software development framework. iris2010_submission_50 |
| 53 |
Michael Dahl, Torbjörn Lundmark, Jenny Eriksson Lundström and Therese Monstad. Aligning IT to Business Goals: Holistic IT-Governance and Strategy Implementation. iris2010_submission_53 |
|
Without paper: Ojelanki Ngwenyama, Taina Kaapu |
|
Public sector / methodology (Petronillen)
|
|
Working group leader: Carl Erik Moe |
| 16 |
Ida Lindgren. Electronic Services in Public Sector Organisations – A Conceptual Analysis and Discussion of Public E-service and E-administration Characteristics. iris2010_submission_16 |
| 17 |
Marius Johannessen. Different Theory, Different Result: Examining how Different theories lead to Different Insights in Government 2.0 Research. iris2010_submission_17 |
| 34 |
Miria Grisot and Margunn Aanestad. Engagement in practice, engagement with practice: exploring multiplicity in complex infrastructural arrangements. iris2010_submission_34 |
| 45 |
Keld Pedersen and Lars Kristian Hansen. IT Project Portfolio Management – Challenges faced by Danish municipalities. iris2010_submission_45 |
| 48 |
Sturla Bakke. How principles of human-computer interactions could contribute in black-boxing complexities in information infrastructures. iris2010_submission_48 |
| 52 |
Carl Erik Moe. Procurement of IS in the public sector – A literature review. iris2010_submission_52 |
|
Without paper: Sari Aalmela, Katarina Lindblad-Gidlund, Suprateek Sarker |
|
Learning/Education (Nøragersmeden)
|
|
Working group leader: Lars Svensson |
| 11 |
Jo Smedley. Modelling the impact of learning through technology. iris2010_submission_11 |
| 28 |
Hanna Olsson. Multimedia Learning – Identifying research directions. iris2010_submission_28 |
| 31 |
Viveca Asproth, Stig C. Holmberg, Christina Amcoff Nyström, Hanna Olsson and Lena-maria Öberg. Triple Loop Learning – a course development model. iris2010_submission_31 |
| 36 |
Rasmus Rasmussen, Benedicte Fleron, Morten Hertzum and Jesper Simonsen. Implementation of Electronic Whiteboards at Two Emergency Departments. iris2010_submission_36 |
| 51 |
Lars Svensson, Stefan Nilsson, Pia Svanberg and Lars-Olof Johansson. From Tutor to Producer: Changes in the design space of online education. iris2010_submission_51 |
| 61 |
Pertti Järvinen. On a structure of a research paper. iris2010_submission_61 |
|
Without paper: Christina Keller |
|
Information systems development (Peder Hjorth)
|
|
Working group leader: Jacob Nørbjerg |
| 1 |
Karsten Jahn and Peter Axel Nielsen. Codified vs. Personalized – A Vertical Approach to the Dilemma of the Knowledge Management Strategies. iris2010_submission_1 |
| 9 |
Mikito Takada. Overpromise and underdeliver: goal-setting as a contributing factor to IS failure. iris2010_submission_9 |
| 25 |
Lise Tordrup Heeager. Compatibility of the agile and the disciplined approaches: a review article. iris2010_submission_25 |
| 30 |
Tero Paivärinta, Kari Smolander and Even Åby Larsen. Towards a Framework for Building Theory from ISD Practices. iris2010_submission_30 |
| 37 |
Jeffry Babb and Jacob Nørbjerg. A Model for Reflective Learning in Small Shop Agile Development. iris2010_submission_37 |
| 42 |
Anna Wingkvist, Morgan Ericsson, Welf Löwe and Rüdiger Lincke. Extending the Concept of Quality in Systems Development — Integrating Software and Information Quality. iris2010_submission_42 |
|
Without paper: Bendik Bygstad, Sabine Madsen |
|
ERP, Mergers and offshoring (Snøvle Maren)
|
|
Working group leader: Jan Damsgaard |
| 3 |
Per Svejvig. Two Contrasting Perspectives of Enterprise Systems: Towards Reconciliation. iris2010_submission_3 |
| 19 |
Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen. Offshoring – the new dilemma of IS research. iris2010_submission_19 |
| 7 |
Maria Alaranta and Eero Martela. Overcoming the Knowledge Gaps in Post-Merger Integration – A Case Study on Merging Corrective Software Maintenance Processes. iris2010_submission_7 |
| 18 |
Siw Lundqvist. In a Merger: A Lack of Information about IS and the Job Situation. iris2010_submission_18 |
| 24 |
Christian Koch, Torben Tambo and Martin Olsen. How little do we need to know about Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)? – A critical review of information systems research on ERP. iris2010_submission_24 |
| 49 |
Ondrej Zach. ERP System Success Assessment in SMEs. iris2010_submission_49 |
|
Without paper: Jan Ljungberg, Reima Suomi |
|
Open/service innovation (Laang Ajs)
|
|
Working group leader: Ulrika Snis |
| 5 |
Marita Holst, Anna Ståhlbröst and Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn. Openness in Living Labs – Facilitating Innovation. iris2010_submission_5 |
| 6 |
Pernilla Gripenberg. Individual ICT-Landscapes: A lense on Human-ICT relationships in transforming everyday lives. iris2010_submission_6 |
| 12 |
Carina Hallqvist. True Participation – a challenge for design of sustainable e-services. iris2010_submission_12 |
| 20 |
Markus Holzweber, Ada Scupola and Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen. Innovation Sources and Role of ICT in Facilities Management Services. iris2010_submission_20 |
| 32 |
Hendrik Hielkema. Living Labs, are there Results? iris2010_submission_32 |
| 55 |
Hanne Westh Nicolajsen, Ada Scupola and Flemming Sørensen. Open innovation using web2.0 technology. iris2010_submission_55 |
|
Without paper: Carina Ihlström-Eriksson, Eli Larsen |
|
|
|
Social media (Tarmløs)
|
|
Working group leader: Judith Molka-Danielsen |
| 15 |
Jan Henrik Storgårds and Johanna Bragge. Subjective Norm and Recommendation of Digital Games. iris2010_submission_15 |
| 29 |
Meri Kuikka, Virpi Tuunainen and Emmi Suhonen. Motivations for and barriers to the use of social exchange in online communities: Case Kassi. iris2010_submission_29 |
| 39 |
Karen Stendal, Judith Molka-Danielsen and Susan Balandin. Virtual worlds: A new opportunity for people with lifelong disabilities. iris2010_submission_39 |
| 41 |
Miia Äkkinen and Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen. Consumer values in social network services. iris2010_submission_41 |
| 47 |
Lina Nilsson, Malin Hofflander, Christel Borg and Sara Eriksén. From Twitter to data based patient record. iris2010_submission_47 |
| 54 |
Arto Lanamäki and Tero Päivärinta. Genre Analysis of Metacommunication in Wikipedia. iris2010_submission_54 |
|
Without paper: Espen Skorve, Maria Spante |